<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.6" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Popularity and personality in online communities.</title>
	<link>http://sophistry.org/2006/07/31/popularity-and-personality-in-online-communities/</link>
	<description>Jeff Durland's views on certain matters, not excluding editorial communications, Web usability, writing, food, and wine.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.6</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Sophistry.org &#187; More on Television Without Pity and the Slate article.</title>
		<link>http://sophistry.org/2006/07/31/popularity-and-personality-in-online-communities/#comment-4074</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 05:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sophistry.org/2006/07/31/popularity-and-personality-in-online-communities/#comment-4074</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Instead, it was mostly a review of the community aspects of that site and an attempt to explain its appeal. You&#8217;ve seen me take a look (twice) at what I think makes a site like Metafilter work and a site like Yahoo! Answers fail. Let&#8217;s see how the factors I describe compare with those described in the Slate article. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Instead, it was mostly a review of the community aspects of that site and an attempt to explain its appeal. You&#8217;ve seen me take a look (twice) at what I think makes a site like Metafilter work and a site like Yahoo! Answers fail. Let&#8217;s see how the factors I describe compare with those described in the Slate article. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff Durland</title>
		<link>http://sophistry.org/2006/07/31/popularity-and-personality-in-online-communities/#comment-31</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sophistry.org/2006/07/31/popularity-and-personality-in-online-communities/#comment-31</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;It's exactly what I'm talking about. Yahoo! answers didn't have a predetermined group of people who would post there, or a well-understood base of expertise, it just had a well-known platform.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s exactly what I&#8217;m talking about. Yahoo! answers didn&#8217;t have a predetermined group of people who would post there, or a well-understood base of expertise, it just had a well-known platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Matt</title>
		<link>http://sophistry.org/2006/07/31/popularity-and-personality-in-online-communities/#comment-30</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 12:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://sophistry.org/2006/07/31/popularity-and-personality-in-online-communities/#comment-30</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;How do you think this "tipping point" idea relates to the flop that is Yahoo! Answers when compared to something like Ask Metafilter.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you think this &#8220;tipping point&#8221; idea relates to the flop that is Yahoo! Answers when compared to something like Ask Metafilter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

